Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ecological time-series study uncovers increased pulmonary embolism risk following SARS-CoV-2 activity in the general population, highlighting delayed endothelial thrombo-inflammation.
Objectives SARS-CoV-2 infection is an established prothrombotic trigger, yet the population-level temporal relationship between circulating viral activity and pulmonary embolism (PE) remains poorly characterized. We aimed to evaluate the short-term association between respiratory viral activity and PE, accounting for specific temporal lags. Study design Ecological time-series study . Methods We conducted a population-level time-series analysis of incident PE hospitalizations in Ontario, Canada, from 2011 to 2024. Using distributed lag non-linear models, we assessed associations between standardized weekly activity of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and PE risk over a 5-week lag. RR per SD increase in viral activity were estimated via negative binomial regression with cross-basis terms, capturing exposure-response and lag-response non-linearities, and adjusted for Fourier seasonal terms and secular trends. A single-virus model assessed SARS-CoV-2 alone, while a multi-pathogen model additionally adjusted for influenza A and RSV. Results Among 70,599 PE cases, SARS-CoV-2 activity demonstrated a significant temporal association with PE. Cumulative RR increased 12% per SD over five weeks (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.00–1.25). The risk followed a distinct delay trajectory, with weekly cumulative RRs peaking at week 3 (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04–1.43). The multi-pathogen model, SARS-CoV-2 showed a higher cumulative RR of 1.26 (95% CI 1.11–1.44), with a lower, non-significant peak at week 3 (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.96–1.32). Conclusions Increased population-level SARS-CoV-2 activity is associated with a heightened risk of PE, peaking at approximately the third week. This delayed peak suggests a protracted thrombo-inflammatory window, likely driven by sustained endothelial injury. These findings highlight the vascular burden of COVID-19 and suggest that infection prevention measures, including vaccination, may provide significant downstream protection against thromboembolic disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: