Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reports escalating equipment costs and home modifications in individuals with severe obesity, highlighting the need for health economic evaluation.
Background: Few data exist on bariatric equipment and housing adaptations prescribed by occupational therapists and used by community-dwelling people with severe obesity (PwSO; body mass index (BMI) ⩾ 40 kg/m 2 ). This study aimed to document the use and costs of equipment and home adaptations by community-dwelling PwSO. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted with 25 consenting PwSO. During home visits an investigator-administered questionnaire captured use of community equipment and housing adaptations. Local and published sources directed a comprehensive micro-costing. Results: Participants were aged 40–87 years (mean 62 years), BMI 40–77 kg/m 2 (mean 55 kg/m 2 ): 20 were housebound. Nineteen participants (76%) used specialist equipment to accommodate larger body size. The most frequently used equipment were rise-recline chairs. Most chairs ( n = 16, 80%) were heavy duty or custom-made, with a mean cost of £2241, more than double the mean cost of standard chairs £993. Analysis indicated a relationship between increasing BMI category and escalating use and cost of bariatric equipment. Housing adaptations ranged from bathroom grab rails to full-scale house extensions including widened doorways. Wet floor showers were the most common housing adaptation (mean cost £6043). Conclusion: These results highlight areas for further research, staff training and health economic evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williamson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: