Theoretical analysis reveals colonial inequalities and technocentrism in mainstream circular economy models, highlighting the need for epistemic plurality and power redistribution.
The Circular Economy (CE) is widely promoted as a regenerative alternative to linear production, yet mainstream CE theories and frameworks are predominantly rooted in Global North and Eurocentric epistemologies and technocentrism. In this paper, I argue that such epistemologies and technocentrism ignores informal economies and indigenous knowledge systems. Furthermore, I argue that the current CE approaches often reproduce colonial patterns by externalising environmental and labour inequalities to poorer regions in the Global South. I propose a novel CE decolonisation framework. The framework focuses on epistemic plurality of CE, power redistribution, the technocentric widening of CE and the transformative impact of CE. I argue that these dimensions of CE decolonisation must be considered across knowledge production, governance, research, and the targeted outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambisisi Ambituuni (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: