Key result
Larger LVT longitudinal diameter is linked to ~6% higher recurrence risk after resolution.
Why the study?
Patients with left ventricular thrombus resolution remain at risk for recurrence and subsequent thromboembolism, but the factors influencing recurrence are not yet fully understood.
Cohort (n=98)
No
Odds Ratio: 1.058 (95% CI 1.003–1.115)
p-value: p=0.04
In patients with resolved left ventricular thrombus, a longitudinal thrombus diameter greater than 23.5 mm is an independent predictor of recurrence, suggesting these patients may benefit from extended anticoagulation therapy.
Longer LVT diameter was associated with recurrence; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification, prospective trials needed before guiding therapy.
Background: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious complication associated with cardiomyopathy and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Patients with LVT resolution remain at risk for recurrence and subsequent thromboembolism. However, the factors influencing the recurrence of LVT are not yet fully understood. This study aimed to identify the risk factors and clinical outcomes related to LVT recurrence and to improve follow-up strategies and treatment options. Methods and results: We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed with LVT on transthoracic echocardiography from January 2018 to April 2021 in Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University. All patients received anticoagulant therapy for more than 6 months and underwent at least two follow-up transthoracic echocardiograms. No statistically significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the LVT recurrence and non-recurrence group, regarding gender, age, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, renal function, previous stroke history, other underlying medical conditions, ejection fraction, or left ventricular diameter. Patients in the recurrence group exhibited a higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention compared to the non-recurrence group (84.6% vs 61.1%, p = 0.03; 76.9% vs 52.8%, p = 0.03). Additionally, patients in the recurrence group tended to have more ventricular aneurysms (50.0% vs 22.2%, p = 0.008) and larger previous thrombus sizes (27.7 ± 12.6 vs 21.4 ± 9.1 mm, p = 0.008) compared to those in the non-recurrence group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the longitudinal diameter of the LVT was an independent risk factor for LVT recurrence (OR 1.058, 95% CI 1.003-1.115, p = 0.04). ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.647 for the longitudinal diameter of LVT, with an optimal cut-off value of 23.5mm, a sensitivity of 62%, and a specificity of 64%. After a follow-up of 3.0 ± 2.5 years, the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the recurrence group was significantly higher than in the non-recurrence group [non-fatal myocardial infarction: 3 (11.5%) vs 1 (1.4%), p = 0.02; MACE: 7 (26.9%) vs 7 (9.7%), p = 0.01]. No statistically significant differences were found in bleeding events, systemic embolism, or all-cause death between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study indicates that a history of myocardial infarction, the presence of ventricular aneurysm, and larger thrombus diameter are significant factors influencing LVT recurrence. Furthermore, the longitudinal diameter of the thrombus is identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence following resolution. We recommend patients with a LVT diameter greater than 23.5 mm consider extending their anticoagulant therapy to mitigate the risk of recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li-li et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resolution (n=98). Longitudinal diameter of left ventricular thrombus was evaluated on Left ventricular thrombus recurrence (OR 1.058, 95% CI 1.003-1.115, p=0.04). The longitudinal diameter of the left ventricular thrombus was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence following resolution (OR 1.058).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: