Mixed-methods study reveals five community engagement strategies in arts-rich primary schools, indicating that safety and openness can coexist through differentiated permeability.
English primary schools are required to be secure, access-controlled sites: safeguarding inspections expect locked gates, vetted visitors and actively managed boundaries. This safe-guarding policy sits in tension with the equally established expectation that schools engage the parents and communities they serve. This paper is the third in a series on how arts-rich primary schools ‘open up’ In a system that pushes them to close down. We examine how these schools open their gates to families and neighborhoods. Drawing on case-study data from the Researching Arts-rich Primary Schools (RAPS) project, a mixed-methods study of arts-rich primary schools across England, we identify five strategies through which artistic practices keep school boundaries permeable: teaching beyond institutional walls, opening buildings as community cultural venues, positioning children as community cultural leaders, sustaining partnerships with cultural organizations, and building place-based curriculum that treats local history and families as a necessity rather than as serendipity or a pedagogical preference. Arts-rich education depends on specialist spaces, professional practitioners, authentic audiences and place-based knowledge that lie beyond the gate. Crucially, openness and safeguarding are not opposed: these schools configure differentiated permeability while complying with safeguarding policy. The analysis has implications for international readers managing the same tensions between safety and openness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: