Comparative framework analysis reveals lower food safety risks in plant-based proteins compared to animal sources, highlighting a novel proactive metric for food prioritization.
Current food safety assessments lack a proactive approach informing decision-makers about the general safety status of foods. Using a semi-quantitative framework, this study developed an integrated food safety indicator to evaluate the overall safety of a single food a priori, by combining evidence on the presence of chemical contaminants, microbial hazards, and allergenic potential. Each component is computed by specific indicators and sub-indicators. The methodology was applied to a case study where we compared plant-based and animal-based protein foods. Results showed that alternative protein foods have lower food safety implications than traditional ones. Having a single measure of food safety enables a better understanding of the safety status of a food and supports structured comparisons among foods. This provides actionable results to decision-makers to set priorities towards foods. Eventually, this also fosters the integration of food safety considerations into broader decision-making settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: