Multicenter cohort study demonstrates multiparametric MRI radiomics from peritumoral zones predicts IDH and MGMT status in diffuse gliomas, highlighting noninvasive molecular profiling utility.
To develop a non‑invasive multiparametric MRI radiomics model for predicting IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation in adult diffuse gliomas, systematically evaluating different peritumoural regions (3 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm) and sequence combinations contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI-CE), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) with multi‑centre external validation. Data from two centres were analysed (UCSF: IDH n = 295, MGMT n = 266; AHHU eligible cohorts: IDH n = 34, MGMT n = 25). The UCSF cohort was stratified into training (80%) and internal test (20%) sets. After model development, the complete pipeline was repeated on all UCSF cases to fit each final model. Feature-complete AHHU subsets were used for the reported external results (IDH n = 24; MGMT n = 22). After training-only imputation and Z-score scaling, radiomic features were screened using ICC, Mann-Whitney U testing, Spearman correlation filtering, a hybrid mRMR procedure, and L1-penalised logistic regression. Five-fold cross-validation within the training set selected the regularisation parameter from 10 logarithmically spaced candidate C values. The locked development models were evaluated on the internal test set, and the full-UCSF refits were evaluated on the external validation set (AHHU). In exploratory external-cohort comparisons, the 5 mm peritumoural T2-FLAIR + ASL model showed the highest observed AUC for IDH prediction (0.977, 95% CI 0.900-1.000), exceeding the 10 mm ASL model ( p < 0.001) and the 3 mm T1WI-CE + T2-FLAIR model ( p = 0.0229). For MGMT prediction, the 3 mm T1WI-CE + T2-FLAIR + ASL model yielded an AUC of 0.800 (95% CI 0.500-1.000). In paired-bootstrap comparisons, it exceeded the tumour-core T2-FLAIR model ( p = 0.018) but not the 5 mm T2-FLAIR model ( p = 0.110). These between-model external comparisons were hypothesis-generating and were not used to refit any model. Peritumoural radiomics showed promising performance for IDH prediction. The 5 mm region had the highest observed performance for IDH in this cohort, whereas the apparent advantage of the 3 mm model for MGMT remains exploratory because of the small external sample and lack of consistent superiority across comparators. Independent validation in larger cohorts is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: