Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Robotics framework evaluation demonstrates precise goal-reaching and safe fault recovery in a 6000 kg mobile robot, highlighting the safety of constrained hierarchical control.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has strong potential in robotics, but exploration-based training complicates safe deployment on large-scale robots. This paper proposes a novel hierarchical goal-reaching framework that integrates stereo visual pose estimation, constrained RL-based motion planning, actuator-level robust adaptive control (RAC), and supervisory safe-return logic. Stereo visual localization is used as the real-time pose-estimation interface with loop closing, map fusion, and relocalization. The RL planner generates goal-reaching references using a problem-specific reward structure and motion constraints that promote goal progress, reduce oscillations, preserve vision-consistent smoothness, and respect the mechanical limits of a heavy skid-steered robot. At the actuation layer, a scaled conjugate-gradient (SCG)-trained deep neural network (DNN) approximates a quasi-static actuator feedforward map from wheel-speed data to nominal control input. This feedforward map is combined with a logarithmic-barrier-based RAC to compensate for residual modeling errors, slip-induced disturbances, and bounded mismatch between the nominal map and real actuator response. For the actuator-level wheel-tracking subsystem, uniformly ultimately bounded tracking with exponential convergence to a disturbance-dependent residual set is established under bounded uncertainty. A logarithmic safety supervisor monitors predefined safety-boundary and localization-consistency triggers and, when activated, applies deterministic braking followed by latched safe-return mode. Experiments on a 6000 kg robot over asphalt and loose-soil terrain demonstrate approximately 3–4 cm SLAM-frame final-position root mean square error (RMSE), improved tracking of RL-generated commands, actuator-level performance over two RAC baselines, and observed deterministic braking and safe-return behavior in the two reported injected-localization-fault cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: