Empirical analysis reveals that concentrated and foreign ownership reduce firm risk in Indian non-financial companies, indicating that board attributes fail to moderate promoter control.
Purpose The purpose of this study is twofold: first, to investigate how ownership structure impacts the risk of the firm. The second is whether corporate board characteristics influence the relationship between ownership concentration and firm risk. Design/methodology/approach This empirical study relied on the non-financial companies of the BSE-100 index for the period 2013–2023. This study uses a random effects estimator, as various optimum tests suggest examining the relationship between ownership structure and firm risk. Findings The results of this study indicate that concentrated ownership is negatively related to firm risk, supporting the alignment hypothesis. Institutional ownership is positively related to firm risk, while foreign ownership is negatively linked to risk measurements. Moreover, the association between concentrated ownership and business risk may not be affected because of the presence of independent directors on the board or by the size of the board. This study reflects that the supreme power of promoters may not be affected by the presence of independent directors or board size. Research limitations/implications This study guides that regulators should follow strict regulations regarding the trading patterns of institutional investors. It is required that the Indian Government adopt a liberal foreign-flow policy that would encourage international investment. Also, it needs to strictly enforce the appointment of independent directors in companies for the efficiency of the corporate boards. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study fills a gap in the literature by examining the link between ownership structure and risk in banks, offering the first study to investigate the ownership structure and risk relationship across a cross-industry sample. To date, no study has explored the moderating effect of corporate boards on the relationship between concentrated ownership and firm risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: