Numerical modeling reveals increased seismic collapse risk in monolithic precast concrete frames compared to cast-in-place structures, highlighting the impact of connection-level pinching.
Monolithic precast reinforced concrete (RC) frames with cast-in-place joint cores and grouted-sleeve splices are increasingly adopted in seismic regions, yet connection degradation is not carried through to system-level fragility: existing studies take hinge properties from code tables or one test, or stop at the joint. This study closes that gap with a reproducible transfer route in which the degrading, pinched M–θ hysteresis identified from a refined joint model becomes structure-level hinge parameters, with every intermediate quantity reported so that the route can be reproduced elsewhere. The joint model is an explicit finite-element interface-spring/contact strategy with Mohr–Coulomb interface behavior, tension cut-off, local spring failure, and sleeve–grout–rebar bond slip. Incremental dynamic analysis and fragility assessment of a six-story monolithic precast frame and a comparable cast-in-place frame show larger inter-story drift demands in the precast frame. At PGA = 0.40 g, its collapse exceedance probabilities are higher by 0.73 and 0.44 percentage points in X and Y, respectively. Global performance is broadly comparable, but the precast frame shows a consistent, modest unfavorable tendency caused by connection pinching and reduced ultimate rotation. Interface treatment, sleeve grouting quality, and connection-level ductility should therefore be explicitly considered in seismic performance assessment and design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: