Key result
Poor cardiovascular health on LE8 is linked to a ~3-fold higher odds of elevated hs-CRP.
Why the study?
Most studies evaluating the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 metric have been limited to US populations, leaving its relationship with systemic inflammation unexplored in Korean adults.
Does poor cardiovascular health status assessed by the Life's Essential 8 score associate with elevated hs-CRP levels in Korean adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=18,500)
Does poor cardiovascular health status assessed by the Life's Essential 8 score associate with elevated hs-CRP levels in Korean adults?
Odds Ratio: 3.21 (95% CI 2.41–4.28)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.1% vs 3.8%
Poor cardiovascular health, as measured by the Life's Essential 8 score, is strongly associated with elevated systemic inflammation (hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/L) in Korean adults.
No immediate practice change warranted; extends US LE8-inflammation data to Koreans but leaves open causality and intervention effects.
Background: Mitigation of systemic inflammation may support the achievement of healthy lives and well-being. The American Heart Association recently proposed “Life’s Essential 8” (LE8) lifestyle metric for evaluating cardiovascular health (CVH) status; however, most existing studies have been limited to populations in the United States. This study examined the association between the LE8 score and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in Korean adults. Methods: A nationwide sample of 18,500 adults was analyzed. The LE8 score was calculated based on four health behaviors (diet, physical activity, smoking, and sleep health) and four biometric health factors (body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure). The LE8 scores were categorized into three groups: 80–100 (ideal CVH), 50–79 (intermediate CVH), and 0–49 (poor CVH). The hs-CRP levels were classified as <3 mg/L or ≥3 mg/L. Logistic regression models were used for the analysis. Results: Among the participants, 21.9%, 67.3%, and 10.9% had ideal, intermediate, and poor CVH, respectively. In the logistic regression models, the adjusted OR (95% CI) for the association between LE8 categories and hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/L was 1.94 (1.56–2.40) for the intermediate group and 3.21 (2.41–4.28) for the poor group, respectively, compared with the ideal group. Conclusions: Poor CVH status assessed by the LE8 lifestyle health metric was associated with high hs-CRP levels. The study findings suggest that future longitudinal studies are required to establish the temporal relationship between the LE8 and hs-CRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baek et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular Health and Systemic Inflammation (n=18,500). Poor Cardiovascular Health (Life's Essential 8 score 0-49) vs. Ideal Cardiovascular Health (Life's Essential 8 score 80-100) was evaluated on High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥ 3 mg/L (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.41-4.28). Poor cardiovascular health, assessed by the Life's Essential 8 metric, was associated with a 3.21-fold higher odds of elevated hs-CRP levels (≥3 mg/L) compared to ideal cardiovascular health.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: