Theoretical modeling demonstrates that coupled transverse confinement alters quantum tunneling actions, indicating that single-variable broadening proxies fail without system-specific refitting.
This exploratory preprint studies a controlled quantum-scattering toy model with an additional harmonically confined coordinate w. It compares a fixed-width one-dimensional barrier, the exact shrinking observable slice V(x,0), and the full coupled (x,w) Hamiltonian. The identical-slice control shows that the non-monotonic transmission turn is not unique to an additional coordinate, while the coupled calculation produces a quantitatively distinct transmission curve and a converged transverse-broadening signal. The central hypothesis remains S_E = f(w), with A = S_E / ℏ the dimensionless tunnelling exponent. The matched-state stress test independently changes longitudinal energy or transverse confinement and retunes the barrier to reproduce center broadening Δw_rms = 0.08, 0.18, and 0.35. The corresponding WKB actions spread by 50.2%, 31.1%, and 22.7% relative to the baseline; the exact-scattering exponent agrees. Thus a universal one-variable proxy A = F(Δw_rms) fails without refitting. Version 3.3 left the numerical data and conclusions unchanged and added the companion tutorial Born-Oppenheimer to Tunnelling Action. That tutorial distinguishes the coordinate w from W_rms(x), ΔW(x), and the center scalar Δw_rms; explains the local and branch-dependent role of W_rms'; treats derivative-coupling gauge dependence; and identifies the gauge-invariant quantum metric g_xx as a candidate for a future matched-state test. Version 3.4 leaves the numerical data and conclusions of Version 3.3 unchanged. It adds the companion tutorial From Kaluza-Klein Compactification to a Tunnelling Decay-Rate Residual. The tutorial derives k_w = n/R and κ_eff² = κ_x² + n²/R² for a separable compact-circle toy model, clarifies that the zero mode reproduces ordinary tunnelling while excited modes further suppress it, and defines the model-independent residual Δκ² = κ_eff² - κ_x². It also states the mode-assignment and low-energy limitations and distinguishes this compact model from the harmonically confined, nonseparable Version 3.3 Hamiltonian. These additions are pedagogical and do not constitute evidence for a fundamental fourth spatial dimension. The work is non-peer-reviewed. The seven files contain the unchanged Version 3.3 main manuscript in PDF and DOCX, the Born-Oppenheimer companion tutorial in PDF and DOCX, the new Kaluza-Klein compactification companion tutorial in PDF and DOCX, and the reproducibility supplement with calculation scripts, CSV data, metadata, convergence checks, and figures. AI assistance is disclosed in all documents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaman Prakash Kanth (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: