Observational study demonstrates nonlinear links between plant spatial configurations and multidimensional perceptions in urban parks, highlighting trade-offs in landscape design.
Urban greening studies have traditionally emphasized vegetation quantity, while the perceptual implications of horticultural composition and spatial configuration remain less clearly understood. This study investigated how horticultural configurations were associated with multidimensional landscape perception across 10 urban parks in Chengdu, China. A total of 500 standardized landscape images, comprising 50 images per park, were assessed by 150 participants across 17 perceptual dimensions. Vegetation composition, spatial configuration, and conventional greenness indicators were quantified from the images and park-level spatial data. Principal component analysis and PERMANOVA were used to characterize structural gradients among parks, while exploratory factor analysis was used to identify integrated perceptual domains. XGBoost models with five-fold cross-validation were subsequently developed to predict individual perceptual outcomes, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret feature contributions and nonlinear response patterns. Multi-objective optimization was further used to explore hypothetical configuration scenarios involving trade-offs among perceptual objectives. The first two structural principal components explained 65.60% of the variation in horticultural composition and spatial organization, and park configurations differed significantly (PERMANOVA: F = 166.66, p = 0.001). Horticultural typologies differed across 15 of the 17 perceptual dimensions (all p < 0.001), with the largest differentiation observed for nature (ε2 = 0.270), species richness (ε2 = 0.259), openness (ε2 = 0.251), being away (ε2 = 0.245), serenity (ε2 = 0.236), and enclosure (ε2 = 0.234). The XGBoost models showed consistently strong predictive performance, with test-set R2 values of 0.692–0.812 and cross-validated R2 values of 0.756–0.796. SHAP analyses indicated differentiated and nonlinear associations: vegetation continuity and enclosure were primarily related to restorative immersion, open configurations to spatial accessibility, and ornamental and compositional complexity to affective richness. The optimization results further identified continuous trade-offs among restorative immersion, spatial openness, and affective richness, rather than a single universally optimal configuration. These findings show that landscape perception is associated with the spatial organization and composition of horticultural elements through multidimensional and nonlinear pathways. The study therefore extends vegetation-quantity assessments by providing a configuration-based analytical framework for exploring perceptually balanced urban horticultural environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: