Comparative observational analysis reveals seasonal error dynamics across atmospheric moisture sensors, indicating satellite navigation systems provide higher resilience than radiometers in wet...
Integrated Water Vapor (IWV) is a key indicator of atmospheric moisture, and its accurate quantification requires precise characterization of the errors inherent to each observing system, a task complicated by the absence of a true, error-free atmospheric reference. This study characterizes the absolute error structures of IWV retrievals from Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Microwave Radiometers (MWR), and Radiosonde using a temporally collocated dataset of 326 trivariate samples acquired in Nicosia, Cyprus over a complete annual cycle (March 2025–March 2026). Triple Collocation Analysis (TCA) and the Three-Cornered Hat (TCH) method were applied without assuming a ground truth, with non-parametric bootstrap resampling (10,000 iterations) used to derive 95% confidence intervals and flag statistically unstable estimates. During the dry season, the recovered error ordering was radiosonde (0.38 kg m−2) below MWR (0.60 kg m−2) and GNSS (1.69 kg m−2), which is consistent with the a priori budget. The MWR error rose sharply to 5.79 kg m−2 in the wet season and to 8.91 kg m−2 in the highest moisture bin, consistent with degradation of the K-band retrieval in the presence of liquid water. The wet season value is a lower bound, since any positive error covariance between the radiometer and the radiosonde acts to increase it, whereas the GNSS error approximately doubled to 3.53 kg m−2, indicating comparatively greater resilience across weather regimes. The radiosonde error, lowest of the three sensors in dry conditions (0.38 kg m−2), could not be reliably resolved in the wet season (98.8% truncation), the lowest moisture bin (71.4%), or the highest moisture bin (94.5%), and it is reported as unstable in each. These results indicate a substantial degradation in radiometric retrieval accuracy and identify the specific regimes in which trivariate error decomposition itself becomes statistically unreliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parde et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: