Algorithmic evaluation demonstrates up to 65% energy reduction and 12.66x lower computational overhead in federated edge networks, highlighting sustainable distributed AI deployment.
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across decentralized edge devices while preserving data privacy. However, real-world deployments are severely hindered by high uplink communication overhead and heterogeneous on-device computational constraints. To address these joint bottlenecks, We present Energy-Aware Adaptive Quantization and Freezing (EA-AQF), a unified framework that co-optimizes communication and computation. EA-AQF introduces a tiered mapping policy that assigns stage-wise activation bitwidths based on a dynamic client resource indicator. To further reduce local training costs, we implement a deterministic, precision-conditioned stage-freezing policy that disables gradient updates for computationally expensive network stages during backpropagation. Additionally, weight quantization is applied to client updates to minimize the communication footprint. We evaluate EA-AQF across diverse architectures, including CNN-7, CNN-17, and ResNet-20 on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and MNIST datasets, and LSTM and MLP on IMDB and HAR datasets, under varying statistical distributions. Experimental results demonstrate that EA-AQF achieves a consistent communication reduction of 72.9% to 74.8% and significant computation reduction up to 12.66 × , which is 1.6 × higher than prior state-of-the-art methods, with a marginal accuracy trade-off typically within 2-3% of full-precision baselines. Quantitatively, our sustainability analysis reveals that EA-AQF achieves up to 65% reduction in energy consumption compared to state-of-the-art, while strictly limiting carbon emissions to as low as 0.0122 kgCO₂e for resource-intensive tasks. Notably, in highly heterogeneous tasks, EA-AQF maintains robust convergence positioning it as a highly efficient solution for sustainable edge AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: