Theoretical framework reveals how prior threat expectations drive trait anger and aggression, highlighting opportunities to optimize clinical interventions.
While anger may help us to detect and respond to threat, individuals high in trait anger and aggression often perceive danger where little exists. Drawing on predictive processing—a framework describing how the brain combines past experiences with current sensory input—we propose that anger-prone individuals overweight prior threat beliefs while underweighting current input. This imbalance may create a persistent state of alertness and readiness for anger and aggression. We identify disruptions in three core error-correction processes— selective attention , belief updating , and active inference —as potential mechanisms underlying this threat overestimation. Finally, we outline clinical implications, showing how predictive processing can help explain why existing anger treatments are effective, where they may be limited, and how they might be optimized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: