Validation study demonstrates dynamic track irregularity control on a kilometer-span railway bridge, indicating improved geometric stability across extreme temperature ranges.
To address the challenge that track irregularity on kilometer-level span high-speed railway bridges exhibits significant temperature-dependent time-varying characteristics, while traditional methods are insufficient to achieve modal consistency in decomposition and long-term effective regulation, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional analysis and differential regulation method based on the multivariate empirical wavelet transform (MEWT). An averaged normalized spectrum is constructed from multi-period track vertical deviation data to enable simultaneous decomposition and wavelength alignment of irregularity modes under different temperatures. The optimal unit length of 84 m is determined using weighted joint Shannon entropy, and a feature matrix is established from three dimensions: temperature correlation, historical chord measurement extreme value, and relative energy fluctuation intensity. The HDBSCAN (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise) method classifies bridge units into four categories. Then, a differential regulation strategy and adjustment optimization algorithm is developed for temperature-sensitive modes. Validation using 26 periods of measured data from the Wufengshan Yangtze River Bridge demonstrates that MEWT achieves a coefficient of variation for modal wavelengths below 0.09. Under the reference temperature of 17 °C, the maximum 60-m mid-chord offset is reduced from 10.93 to 1.73 mm, a reduction of 84.17%. Within the extreme temperature range of 0.2–31.5 °C, all regulated chord values are maintained within 2 mm, demonstrating enhanced regularity retention capability. By reasonably retaining long-wave thermal deformation components, invalid adjustments are effectively avoided, reducing engineering complexity and maintenance costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: