Time-series comparative analysis reveals baseline SARIMA outperforming hybrid SARIMA-LSTM in daily traffic accident forecasting, suggesting neural residual modeling does not necessarily boost...
This study investigates the forecasting of daily road traffic accidents using time series models, through a controlled comparative evaluation of baseline SARIMA and Hybrid SARIMA-LTSM frameworks. We employ a Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model to capture linear and seasonal patterns in accident data from 2010 to 2023. To address potential non-linearities, we extend the approach by modelling SARIMA residuals using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), including bidirectional RNN (BiRNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) variants, to develop a hybrid SARIMA-RNN framework. The hybrid model integrates SARIMA forecasts with RNN-based residual predictions as a methodological extension whose empirical performance is rigorously evaluated against the baseline. Within residual-domain model selection, the unidirectional LSTM achieved the lowest RMSE (0.184) and MAPE (1.0966%) among tested architectures, confirming its effectiveness in capturing temporal dependencies in the log-residual space. A hybrid SARIMA-LSTM model was also evaluated to enhance residual prediction; however, the one-step-ahead rolling-origin strategy with a 7-day sliding window did not improve accuracy relative to the baseline SARIMA, yielding only minor increases in RMSE and MAPE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: