Cross-sectional survey uncovers distinct laughter-related dispositions among bully-victims in elementary students, suggesting targeted profiles for early bullying intervention.
Beyond the conventional bully and victim roles, some individuals exhibit both behaviors, referred to as “double-trouble.” To facilitate early identification, this study examined dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at in Taiwanese students. In light of differing gelotophobia-katagelasticism relationships found in Swiss (negative, non-significant) versus Taiwanese (significantly positive) samples, we hypothesized that victims would show high levels of gelotophobia, bullies would be high in katagelasticism, and double-trouble individuals’ high levels of gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. A total of 755 Taiwanese fifth- and sixth-grade students completed the PhoPhiKat-TC and the Bullying Experiences Scales. Results indicated that victims and double-trouble individuals demonstrated higher gelotophobia, whereas bullies and double-trouble individuals exhibited higher katagelasticism. Double-trouble individuals showed the highest levels in gelotophilia, whereas uninvolved individuals scored lowest across all traits. These findings align with prior studies, providing insights into differentiating double-trouble traits and highlighting practical implications for early bullying intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: