Experimental study demonstrates accelerated tool wear during machining of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel, indicating non-metallic inclusions govern machinability reductions.
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables near-net shape parts with complex geometries, but precision components require machining to meet surface requirements. This study links fabrication-induced microstructures to turning machinability of 316L stainless steel produced by laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) and directed energy deposition (DED-LB). Unlike previous studies focusing primarily on grain structure and anisotropy, this work identifies non-metallic inclusions as a governing microstructural factor affecting tool wear during machining of AM 316L. Compared with wrought material, AM materials exhibited columnar grains, higher crystallographic misorientation, and a hardness increase of 100% and 45% for PBF-LB and DED-LB material respectively. In addition, higher densities of oxide inclusions were found in the AM variants, whereas wrought material additionally contained sulfides. Although initial cutting forces differed by less than 10%, tool life tests revealed that additively manufactured materials showed consistently faster flank wear development than the wrought material, resulting in earlier attainment of the wear criterion and tool-life reductions of up to ~57%. Non-metallic inclusions were identified as a major factor governing wear progression, suggesting that limiting oxygen uptake and tailoring inclusions could improve machinability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: