Methodological study demonstrates a human-in-the-loop annotation platform for tokamak diagnostics, indicating reduced expert labelling workload in nuclear fusion research.
Training high-performing ML models requires large volumes of high quality, labelled data. While nuclear fusion experiments generate extensive datasets – JET produced 105,929 pulses, each with more than 10GB of raw data [1] – much of this data lacks the annotations necessary for effective ML training. Retrospective annotation is both challenging and time consuming, as domain experts lack the appropriate tools to effectively label historic pulses. To address this challenge, RSEs and domain experts have collaborated to develop an open-source human-in-the-loop annotation platform for labelling tokamak diagnostic data [2]. This combines a web-based user interface and a REST API built around data models defined using Pydantic [3], with validated annotations stored in a MongoDB [4] database for later reuse. The modular design supports multiple data access layers from different machines, with simple integration of new sources. Custom ML models can be defined by the user, with training and prediction tasks scheduled via the UI and executed using Ray [5]. These reduce the workload for scientists, who can focus on refining model predictions rather than labelling from scratch. This demonstrates how infrastructure co-developed between RSEs and domain experts, focussed on data validation, extensibility and reusability, plays a key role in the research journey. [1]: Vega, J., et al. "New developments at JET in diagnostics, real-time control, data acquisition and information retrieval with potential application to ITER." Fusion Engineering and Design 84.12 (2009): 2136-2144. [2]: TokTagger. https://github.com/ukaea/toktagger [3]: Pydantic. https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic [4]: The MongoDB Database. https://github.com/mongodb/mongo [5]: Ray. https://github.com/ray-project/ray
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Field et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: