Retrospective surveillance study reveals elevated pork microbiological non-compliance during rainy seasons and in large-scale slaughterhouses, indicating a need for risk-based hygiene controls.
Microbiological non-compliance in pork may indicate deficiencies in slaughterhouse hygiene and pathogen control. This retrospective surveillance study evaluated associations of season and slaughterhouse production scale with microbiological non-compliance in 3103 pork samples collected in Lower Northern Thailand during 2015–2024. Samples were assessed using Department of Livestock Development criteria for aerobic plate count (APC), coliforms, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp. Outcome-specific mixed-effects logistic regression models included calendar year, season, production scale, and province as fixed effects and slaughterhouse as a random intercept. Salmonella spp. was the most frequent non-compliance endpoint (40.90%), followed by APC (36.61%). Compared with winter, the rainy season was associated with higher odds of coliform (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.23–2.50) and Salmonella spp. non-compliance (AOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.20–1.91). High-scale slaughterhouses had higher odds of coliform (AOR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.21–5.64), E. coli (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.22–4.69), and Salmonella spp. non-compliance (AOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17–3.48) than low-scale facilities. These findings support seasonally targeted, risk-based surveillance and continued direct pathogen testing alongside hygiene indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mapongpeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: