Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Laboratory study demonstrates significant substrate interference in fire debris spectroscopic profiles, highlighting reference benchmarks for forensic arson investigations.
Ignitable liquid residues (ILRs) and combustion-derived fire debris are critical evidence in arson investigations, yet substrate-derived pyrolysis products often complicate accelerant identification. This study comparatively characterized ignitable liquid residues and representative fire debris substrates using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD) to generate preliminary spectroscopic information relevant to fire investigations in Ghana. Gasoline, diesel, kerosene, turpentine, and paint thinner, together with biomass-based, polymeric, and electrical substrates, were combusted under controlled laboratory conditions. FTIR analyses revealed characteristic absorptions at approximately 1701 cm−1 (C = O stretching), 1578–1509 cm−1 (aromatic C = C vibrations), 2950–2850 cm−1 (aliphatic C–H stretching), and 1000–1100 cm−1 (C–O stretching associated with cellulose-derived products). Nylon and electrical materials exhibited additional absorptions near 3345–3353 cm−1 attributable to N–H/O–H vibrations. XRD analyses indicated predominantly amorphous carbonaceous soot with additional crystalline diffraction features. The results demonstrate significant substrate-induced spectral interference and provide preliminary spectroscopic information that may support future nondestructive fire debris characterization and arson investigations in resource-limited forensic laboratories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tulashie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: