Demonstrates machine-learning EEG classification of nitrogen narcosis in divers, indicating potential for real-time safety monitoring.
Nitrogen narcosis causes acute cognitive impairment in divers breathing compressed air at depth, increasing injury and fatality risk. Susceptibility varies widely between individuals, making real-time cortical monitoring a potential safety tool. We recorded 32-channel electroencephalography (EEG) from 45 divers (both sexes; aged 20–55 years) at rest across four randomized crossover hyperbaric studies. We manipulated pressure (101–811 kPa) and breathing gas (air or heliox) to create two classes of recordings: narcotic (high-pressure air) or non-narcotic (low-pressure air; heliox at any pressure); our outcome was therefore gas composition, not direct cognitive impairment. We extracted 2,720 features (17 feature types × 32 channels × 5 frequency subbands) from preprocessed EEG epochs, trained six machine-learning classifiers using leave-one-participant-out cross-validation on a training set (24 participants), and evaluated the best-performing model on a test set (9 participants) and hold-out set (12 participants). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.50 (chance ≈ 0; p = 0.001) and accuracy of 82% (baseline 76%; p = 0.001) on the test set, and MCC of 0.25 (chance ≈ 0; p = 0.001) and accuracy of 69% (baseline 69%; p = 0.77) on the hold-out set collected years later. Feature elimination retained 157 features; feature importance analysis identified zero-crossing rate, Hjorth mobility, and Katz fractal dimension at delta-band frequencies (< 4 Hz) over the anterior and posterior midline as the most important features. Easily computed EEG features with an LDA classifier can detect neurophysiological signatures of nitrogen narcosis, potentially enabling real-time passive monitoring of divers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: