Benchmarking study demonstrates that entropy-gated plasticity improves retention across visual continual learning tasks, indicating that predictive entropy effectively mitigates catastrophic...
Catastrophic forgetting remains a central challenge in continual learning. Existing approaches based on regularization or episodic memory offer effective solutions but introduce specific computational and memory tradeoffs. This work presents Entropy-Gated Plasticity Regulation (EGPR), a lightweight mechanism that modulates learning rates based on the temporal derivative of predictive entropy. By calibrating the entropy distribution on an initial task and gating subsequent weight updates through a sigmoid function of the entropy z-score, EGPR selectively inhibits plasticity when the network encounters out-of-distribution data. A complementary mechanism, Depth-Modulated Plasticity (DMP), applies layer-wise scaling to preserve feature representations in early layers while permitting adaptation in later layers. Empirical evaluation across six benchmarks (Split-MNIST, Permuted-MNIST, Rotated-MNIST, Split-FashionMNIST, Split-CIFAR10, and Split-CIFAR100) with five random seeds demonstrates that EGPR achieves significantly higher retention than Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) in five of six benchmarks (one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.031), without requiring episodic memory or explicit task boundaries. On Split-MNIST, EGPR achieves 85.7% retention compared to 10.0% for EWC, without any episodic memory. Furthermore, combining EGPR with experience replay yields statistically significant retention improvements over standard replay alone in all six benchmarks (p = 0.031), with gains ranging from +3.2 to +45.3 percentage points. On Split-CIFAR10, EGPR+Replay achieves 59.5% retention compared to 14.2% for replay alone, establishing EGPR as a highly effective complementary module for existing replay systems. The method's boundary conditions, notably the Semantic Distance Deadlock on complex visual domains, are documented and analyzed to inform future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jero Lemos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: