Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluative study reveals intermediate-low public security governance in Nuevo León, indicating uneven articulation among institutional capacity, rule of law, and corruption control.
This article constructs and applies a sectoral index to evaluate the governance of public security policy in Nuevo León. The study is based on the six dimensions of the World Bank governance model: voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption. These dimensions are adapted to the public security field through indicators from official sources, public surveys, and specialized indices. The research adopts an evaluative approach: it normalizes indicators on a 0-to-1 scale, calculates a simple index with equivalent weighting, and then proposes an adjusted index using theoretical weighting inspired by Luis F. Aguilar’s concept of public governance. The simple index produced a value of 0.397, while the adjusted index reached 0.425. Both results suggest an intermediate-low level of governance in public security policy in Nuevo León. The main finding is not a complete absence of institutional capacity, but an uneven articulation among government effectiveness, legality, citizen participation, political stability, rule of law, and control of corruption. The article contributes to the debate on subnational governance by proposing a sectoral measurement applied to a specific public policy rather than evaluating governance at an aggregate governmental level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
León et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: