Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Grounded in current shifts toward postqualitative conversations, we provide methodological scaffolding for qualitative scholars and students based on our use of improvisational inquiry. We have attempted to balance the fine line between postpositivist expectations for overdetermined structure and improvisational, postqualitative expectations for fluidity by creating a scaffolding sous rature, that is, a scaffolding that simultaneously provides support and possibility with the recognition that such structure is strategic, inadequate yet necessary, but also must continuously be opened up and reimagined (Derrida, 1974). We feel that our eight-point scaffolding for improvisational inquiry provides scholars and students with a strategic way to satisfy traditional expectations of methodological design, yet also push research toward the forefront of the current postqualitative conversations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berbary et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: