Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigated high‐achieving fifth‐grade students' achievement gains and conceptual reorganization during a unit on convection. Specifically, the achievement and cognitive gains that occurred as a result of interactions of high‐achieving students with a high‐achieving or low‐achieving laboratory partner were compared. The study design included an instructional sequence of three dyadic inquiry investigations related to convection currents as well as pre‐ and postassessments consisting of a multiple‐choice test, card sorting task, construction of a concept map, and an interview. Results showed no significant differences for achievement of high‐achieving students regardless of the partner's achievement level and only slight differences in conceptual reorganization. The implications of this study for heterogeneous grouping and construction of knowledge by dyads is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carter et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: