Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Among 175 clinical isolates of Staph. albus (Staph. epidermidis)—most of them from blood cultures—resistance (MIC ≤ 12.5 μg/ml) was most frequent to penicillin G (50%) and ampicillin (41%), but 10% were resistant to methicillin, 5% to oxacillin and diphenicillin, less than 2% to nafcillin and none to cephalothin. A varying number of these strains were also tested against 3 additional penicillins, 6 other antibiotics and fusidic acid; resistance was most frequent to chloramphenicol (60%), tetracycline (48%) and erythromycin (29%), none of them were resistant to kanamycin and a varying proportion were resistant to the other agents. Penicillinase-like action was demonstrated by the Haight-Finland test with 119 of the 175 strains; 12 of these strains, including 5 that were methicillin-resistant, were studied further. The 12 strains all produced a penicillin G-beta-lactamase but cell preparations from the 5 methicillin-resistant strains failed to destroy methicillin in 24 hours. There was no correlation between the MIC of methicillin and enzyme activity or results of the Haight-Finland test. Inoculum size had a marked effect on the MIC of methicillin for methicillin-resistant strains, but not for methicillin-sensitive strains. The experimental data favor the hypothesis that the inoculum effect was due to presence in the cultures of a small number of cells with inherent resistance rather than to the action of a methicillin-destroying enzyme. No methicillin-resistant strains of Staph. aureus have been isolated at this hospital, but the finding of methicillin-resistant strains of Staph. albus may portend the appearance of such strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjellander et al. (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: