Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A phenylquinoxaline (PQ) AB monomer mixture was treated with monofunctional and difunctional end‐capping agents and with and without a coupling agent to afford phenylethynyl‐terminated linear PQ oligomers. The resulting PQ oligomers were soluble in common organic solvents and had intrinsic viscosities (IVs) of 0.21–0.30 dL/g. The glass‐transition temperature (Tg) of the diphenylethynyl‐end‐capped PQ oligomer on both sides increased the most, from 215 °C (before curing) to 251 °C (after curing). The PQ AB2 monomer, which acted as both a coupling agent and a monomer for the hyperbranched polymer, was treated with an AB monomer and end‐capping agents to afford phenylethynyl‐terminated hyperbranched polyphenylquinoxalines (PPQs). They were also soluble in common organic solvents, had IVs of 1.00–1.65 dL/g and Tg's of 251–253 °C, and underwent exothermic cure with maxima around 412–442 °C. The Tg's of the cured hyperbranched PPQs ranged from 258 to 261 °C, depending on the number of phenylethynyl groups on the surface. After further curing, they displayed a Tg of 316 °C in one sample and turned into a fully crosslinked network. The dynamic melt viscosities of a linear oligomer (IV = 0.21 dL/g), a hyperbranched sample (IV = 1.00 dL/g), and a linear reference PPQ (IV = 1.29 dL/g) were compared with respect to the processing temperature. The PQ oligomer and hyperbranched PPQ had low melt viscosities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baek et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: