Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NUMAZAKI, K., CHIBA, S., NIIDA, Y., KOMATSTT, M. and HASHIMOTO, N. Evaluation of Diagnostic Assays for Neonatal and Infantile Chlamydial Infections. Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 1993, 170 (2), 123-129 - Several diagnostic assays for neonatal and infantile chlamydial infections, isolation with tissue culture, antigen detection by enzyme immunoassay (ETA) (IDEIA Chlamydia test), a nonisotopic DNA probe (Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay), serum IgM antibody detection by ETA (SeroELISA Chlamydia TRUE IgM), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were evaluated. Of 210 clinical specimens (170 nasopharyngeal and 40 conjunctival swabs) from 53 neonates and 102 infants with respiratory insufficiency and respiratory tract infections which were suspected to be associated chlamydial infection, chlamydial antigens were detected in 30 by IDEIA Chlamydia. Of these 3Q samples, C. trachomatis was isolated from 27 specimens. Samples from 15 neonates and 6 infants were culture-positive and IDEIA Chlamydia-positive. Of 30 samples, 27 were tested with PCR and 8 with DNA probe. Twenty-three of 27 specimens were positive with PCR, while only one specimen was positive with DNA probe. ETA can be used for the diagnosis and screening of neonatal and infantile chlamydial infections. - Chlamydia trachomatis; ETA; pneumonia
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Numazaki et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: