Pilot study demonstrates high screening sensitivity for malignant melanoma using deep learning on histologic slides, highlighting its potential to assist pathologist workflows.
OBJECTIVE: The integration of an artificial intelligence tool into pathologists' workflow may lead to a more accurate and timely diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, directly patient care. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the performance of such a model in achieving clinical-grade diagnoses of Spitz nevi, dermal and junctional melanocytic nevi, and melanomas. METHODS: We created a beginner-level training environment by teaching our algorithm to perform cytologic inferences on 136,216 manually annotated tiles of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides consisting of unequivocal melanocytic nevi, Spitz nevi, and invasive melanoma cases. We sequentially trained and tested our network to provide a final diagnosis-classification on 39 cases in total. Positive predictive value (precision) and sensitivity (recall) were used to measure our performance. RESULTS: The tile-classification algorithm predicted the 136,216 irrelevant, melanoma, melanocytic nevi, and Spitz nevi tiles at sensitivities of 96%, 93%, 94% and 73%, respectively. The final trained model was able to correctly classify and predict the correct diagnosis in 85.7% of unseen cases (n = 28), reporting at or near screening-level performances for precision and recall of melanoma (76.2%, 100.0%), melanocytic nevi (100.0%, 75.0%), and Spitz nevi (100.0%, 75.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study proves that convolutional networks trained on cellular morphology to classify melanocytic proliferations can be used as a powerful tool to assist pathologists in screening for melanoma versus other benign lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snyder et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: