Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classification is fundamental to all artefactual archaeology, and no one who works with artefacts can be unaware of the doubts that surround many classifications. How similar are the similar things that belong together? How different are the different things that belong apart? What do the classes of similar things actually amount to? This paper looks at some fundamental questions of classification, believing that classification is too important a practical matter to be left to the theoreticians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Y. Adams (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: