The study identifies and characterizes multiple minor forms of renin in mouse submaxillary glands, revealing differently processed forms of the major gene product and evidence of a second gene product.
Does not alter clinical renin assessment; leaves open whether a second renin gene product exists in humans.
Three minor forms of renin from the submaxillary glands of male mice called D1, D2, and E have been purified to homogeneity. Their amino acid compositions are identical to the principal form of mouse submaxillary gland renin (renin A), except for 1, 1, and 2 extra arginine residues, respectively. The electrophoretic mobility of renin D2 does not change upon reduction, indicating that its heavy and light chains are linked by more than a disulfide bond. The light chain of renin D1 has an electrophoretic mobility different from the light chain of renin A. Renin D2 is proposed to be renin A with an arginine-arginine dipeptide connecting the carboxyl terminus of the heavy chain to the NH2 terminus of the light chain, with the light chain missing the carboxyl-terminal arginine of renin A. Renin D1 is suggested to be renin D2 with the peptide bond between an arginine and the NH2 terminus of the light chain cleaved. Renin E is proposed to be renin D1 plus the carboxyl-terminal arginine of the light chain. A fourth minor form of male mouse submaxillary renin, called renin B/A, has been purified to homogeneity in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and in isoelectric focusing. Renin B/A seems to be a second renin gene product which is difficult to separate from renin A. Renin B/A has an amino acid composition significantly different from renin A, and all three preparations of B/A had compositions significantly different from one another. For renin B/A, the light chain sequence and the first 53 NH2-terminal residues of its heavy chain sequence were identical to renin A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poe et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: