Key result
Unrestricted availability of sugammadex increased its use for muscle relaxant reversals from 7.1% to 65.3% (P<0.0001) and significantly reduced anaesthetic theatre time.
Why the study?
Does unrestricted availability of sugammadex change clinical anaesthetic practice and patient outcomes in patients requiring intubation?
Observational (n=374)
No
Does unrestricted availability of sugammadex change clinical anaesthetic practice and patient outcomes in patients requiring intubation?
Unrestricted availability of sugammadex significantly changes the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents, and may reduce anaesthetic theatre time.
Unrestricted sugammadex availability may optimize theatre efficiency; leaves open effects on patient outcomes and need for randomized confirmation.
This retrospective casenote audit involving 374 patients requiring intubation for an anaesthetic found that when the availability of sugammadex became unrestricted, its use increased from 7.1 to 65.3% (P <0.0001) of all muscle relaxant reversals, while neostigmine use decreased from 59.6 to 12.5%. Rocuronium use decreased slightly (90.8 to 79.2%, P=0.006) but vecuronium use increased (2.1 to 8.3%, P=0.02). Cisatracurium and suxamethonium use were unchanged. Total rocuronium dose (55.9 ± 24.1 vs 60.4 ± 22.3 mg) and the number of doses (1.9 ± 1.48 to 1.96 ± 1.27) were unchanged, but the time between the last dose and reversal decreased (91.7 ± 68.1 to 62 ± 52.4 minutes, P=0.0002). There appeared to be no change in postoperative nausea and vomiting, or post-anaesthesia care unit time or oxygen saturation levels. Anaesthetic theatre time fell from 143.5 ± 85.8 to 120 ± 71.2 minutes (P=0.01) and remained significant when adjusted for confounding variables (ratio of means 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.34, P=0.02), although inferences in relation to causality are limited by the retrospective and observational design of the study. Hospital stay also appeared to fall (4.2 ± 3.5 to 3.4 ± 3.0 days, P=0.035), but was not statistically significant when adjusted for confounding variables (ratio of means 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.2, P=0.59). These observations suggest that the unrestricted availability of sugammadex will change how steroid-based neuromuscular blocking drugs are used and reversed, but further research is needed to determine if patient outcomes will improve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watts et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Patients requiring intubation for an anaesthetic (n=374). Unrestricted availability of sugammadex vs. Restricted availability of sugammadex (prior period) was evaluated on Sugammadex use for muscle relaxant reversals (p=<0.0001). Unrestricted availability of sugammadex increased its use for muscle relaxant reversals from 7.1% to 65.3% (P<0.0001) and significantly reduced anaesthetic theatre time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: