Key result
High intensity signals in carotid plaques on TOF-MRA MIP images were associated with significantly larger intraplaque hemorrhage volumes (142.8 vs 53.4 mm3, p=0.014) compared to HIS-negative plaques.
Why the study?
Does high intensity signal on TOF-MRA MIP images correlate with intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid-rich necrotic core volumes in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
Reviewers blinded to clinical information and TOF-MRA MIP results
Does high intensity signal on TOF-MRA MIP images correlate with intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid-rich necrotic core volumes in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis?
Effect estimate: 2.7 times larger
Absolute Event Rate: 142.8% vs 53.4%
p-value: p=0.014
High intensity signals on routine TOF-MRA MIP images strongly correlate with increased intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid-rich necrotic core volumes, particularly in patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis.
May facilitate noninvasive IPH detection on routine TOF-MRA; leaves open outcome validation in carotid stenosis.
BACKGROUND: Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and lipid rich necrotic core (LRNC) have been associated with accelerated plaque growth, luminal narrowing, future surface disruption and development of symptomatic events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quantitative relationships between high intensity signals (HIS) in the plaque on TOF-MRA and IPH or LRNC volumes as measured by multicontrast weighted CMR. METHODS: Seventy six patients with a suspected carotid artery stenosis or carotid plaque by ultrasonography underwent multicontrast carotid CMR. HIS presence and volume were measured from TOF-MRA MIP images while IPH and LRNC volumes were separately measured from multicontrast CMR. RESULTS: For detecting IPH, HIS on MIP images overall had high specificity (100.0%, 95% CI: 93.0 - 100.0%) but relatively low sensitivity (32%, 95% CI: 20.8 - 47.9%). However, the sensitivity had a significant increasing relationship with underlying IPH volume (p = 0.033) and degree of stenosis (p = 0.022). Mean IPH volume was 2.7 times larger in those with presence of HIS than in those without (142.8 ± 97.7 mm(3) vs. 53.4 ± 56.3 mm(3), p = 0.014). Similarly, mean LRNC volume was 3.4 times larger in those with HIS present (379.8 ± 203.4 mm(3) vs. 111.3 ± 122.7 mm(3), p = 0.001). There was a strong correlation between the volume of the HIS region and the IPH volume measured from multicontrast CMR (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MIP images are easily reformatted from three minute, routine, clinical TOF sequences. High intensity signals in carotid plaque on TOF-MRA MIP images are associated with increased intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid-rich necrotic core volumes. The technique is most sensitive in patients with moderate to severe stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid artery stenosis or carotid plaque (n=76). High intensity signal (HIS) on TOF-MRA MIP images vs. HIS-negative plaques was evaluated on Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) volume (2.7 times larger, p=0.014). High intensity signals in carotid plaques on TOF-MRA MIP images were associated with significantly larger intraplaque hemorrhage volumes (142.8 vs 53.4 mm3, p=0.014) compared to HIS-negative plaques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: