Key result
An embedded edge AI adaptive filtering system reduced processing time compared to classical DSPs and general standards while maintaining signal integrity for EMG signal processing.
Why the study?
EMG signals traditionally processed with LTI techniques risk information loss, creating a need for embedded edge AI processing to handle non-LTI biosignals on-device.
Edge computing using embedded AI is a superior alternative for EMG signal processing when on-device analysis is required, offering reduced processing time and maintained signal integrity.
Edge AI cuts EMG processing time versus DSPs while preserving integrity; leaves open whether it improves real-world neuromuscular or cardiac monitoring.
In recent times, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become ubiquitous in technological fields, mainly due to its ability to perform computations in distributed systems or the cloud. Nevertheless, for some applications -as the case of EMG signal processing- it may be highly advisable or even mandatory an on-the-edge processing, i.e., an embedded processing methodology. On the other hand, sEMG signals have been traditionally processed using LTI techniques for simplicity in computing. However, making this strong assumption leads to information loss and spurious results. Considering the current advances in silicon technology and increasing computer power, it is possible to process these biosignals with AI-based techniques correctly. This paper presents an embedded-processing-based adaptive filtering system (here termed edge AI) being an outstanding alternative in contrast to a sensor-computer- actuator system and a classical digital signal processor (DSP) device. Specifically, a PYNQ-Z1 embedded system is used. For experimental purposes, three methodologies on similar processing scenarios are compared. The results show that the edge AI methodology is superior to benchmark approaches by reducing the processing time compared to classical DSPs and general standards while maintaining the signal integrity and processing it, considering that the EMG system is not LTI. Likewise, due to the nature of the proposed architecture, handling information exhibits no leakages. Findings suggest that edge computing is suitable for EMG signal processing when an on-device analysis is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Proaño-Guevara et al. (2022) studied EMG signal processing. Embedded-processing-based adaptive filtering system (edge AI) vs. Sensor-computer-actuator system and classical digital signal processor (DSP) was evaluated on Processing time and signal integrity. An embedded edge AI adaptive filtering system reduced processing time compared to classical DSPs and general standards while maintaining signal integrity for EMG signal processing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: