Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The fast-response feature from a superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) device is favored for suppressing instantaneous voltage and power fluctuations, while the low-cost feature from a conventional battery energy storage (BES) device suits to achieve long-time voltage and power compensations in the power distribution and utilization systems. This paper investigates a new dc voltage swell compensating scheme by using an SMES-BES-based hybrid energy storage technology. In the preliminary tests, an iron-core copper coil is used to imitate high-temperature superconducting inductor, and this SMES emulator is, then, combined with a lead-acid battery to form a dc voltage swell compensator device. The experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of this SMES-BES-based dc voltage swell compensator to avoid the initial impulse charging current for the lead-acid battery and to extend the steady compensating time duration for the SMES simultaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: