Key result
Managing cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with chronic kidney disease requires an individualized approach due to risks of venous hypertension and systemic infection.
Why the study?
Decisions regarding optimal hemodialysis modality and permanent vascular access are challenging in CIED recipients due to risks of venous hypertension and systemic infection.
Managing CIEDs and hemodialysis vascular access in CKD/ESKD patients requires an individualized, multidisciplinary approach due to risks of central vein stenosis and systemic infection.
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a standard therapy utilized for different cardiac conditions. They are implanted in a growing number of patients, including those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure and malignant arrhythmia, remain the leading cause of mortality among CKD patients, especially in ESKD. CIED implantation procedures are considered minor surgery, typically with transvenous leads inserted via upper central veins, followed by an impulse generator introduced subcutaneously. A decision regarding optimal hemodialysis (HD) modality and the choice of permanent vascular access (VA) could be particularly challenging in CIED recipients. The potential consequences of arteriovenous access on the CIED side are related to (1) venous hypertension from lead-related central vein stenosis and (2) the risk of systemic infection. Therefore, when creating permanent vascular access, the clinical scenario may be complicated by the CIED presence on one side and the lack of suitable vessels for arteriovenous fistula on the contralateral arm. These factors suggest the need for an individualized approach according to different clinical situations: (1) CIED in a CKD patient; (2) CIED in a patient on hemodialysis CIED; and (3) VA in a patient with CIED. This complex clinical conundrum creates the necessity for close cooperation between cardiologists and nephrologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowak et al. (2021) conducted a review in Chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and vascular access was evaluated. Managing cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with chronic kidney disease requires an individualized approach due to risks of venous hypertension and systemic infection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: