Key result
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hemodialysis patients show no significant primary prevention benefits and higher secondary prevention mortality compared to nonhemodialysis CKD patients.
Why the study?
The benefits of ICD implantation for primary prevention in hemodialysis patients remain controversial, and evidence on outcomes and risk reduction strategies in this population requires review.
Does ICD implantation improve survival and prevent sudden cardiac death in hemodialysis patients?
Does ICD implantation improve survival and prevent sudden cardiac death in hemodialysis patients?
The benefit of ICD implantation in hemodialysis patients remains controversial, highlighting a need for better risk stratification strategies in this high-risk population.
Caution against routine ICD use in hemodialysis; leaves open need for dedicated trials and refined risk stratification.
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading life-threatening complications in hemodialysis patients. In this scenario, both tachy-arrhythmias and brady-arrhythmias are involved with related hemodialysis and nonhemodialysis-dependent mechanisms; moreover, those arrhythmias usually occur in different time intervals before sudden cardiac death (SCD). Furthermore, current evidence shows that the presence of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) reduces the benefits of implantable cardioverter--defibrillators (ICDs), which increases the risk of both arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death, especially in patients with advanced stages of heart failure. Notably, patients with advanced CKD show a more severe degree of heart failure compared with mild CKD patients. However, the benefits of the ICD implantation in the primary prevention of hemodialysis patients is still controversial, and by now, no significant benefits have emerged compared with nonhemodialysis-dependent CKD patients. In secondary prevention, hemodialysis patients with ICD implantation have higher mortality rates compared with nonhemodialysis-dependent CKD patients with ICD. On the other hand, most articles include hemodialysis patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, neglecting those with preserved systolic function. This review focuses on the epidemiology of SCD in the setting of hemodialysis and the current evidence on ICD implantation in patients on hemodialysis therapy analyzing novel strategies, which might reduce the risk of ICD placing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted a review in Hemodialysis and advanced chronic kidney disease. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) vs. Nonhemodialysis-dependent CKD patients was evaluated. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hemodialysis patients show no significant primary prevention benefits and higher secondary prevention mortality compared to nonhemodialysis CKD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: