Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To study non-osteoclastic sources of cathepsin K in periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue samples were obtained from 10 otherwise healthy periodontitis pati-ents during routine periodontal flap operations and 10 systemically and periodontally healthy individuals who underwent extraction operations for retained third molars. Methods used were immunohistochemistry, image analysis, immunofluorescence double-staining, gingival fibroblast culture, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) stimulation and Western blotting. RESULTS: Macrophage-like cells, fibroblast-like cells, vascular endothelial cells and gingival epithelial cells were more intensively stained for cathepsin K and also more frequent in periodontitis than in controls (665 ± 104 vs 258 ± 40 cells mm(-2) , P < 0.01). Some cathepsin K(+) cells in periodontal tissues were CD68(+) , but some were CD68(-) and probably fibroblasts. Indeed, in gingival fibroblast culture, resting fibroblasts released cathepsin K, more 43 kD procathepsin K than 29 kD active cathepsin K. TNF-α increased the release of the activated cathepsin K 4- to 5-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that GCF-cathepsin K is not only osteoclast-derived, but in periodontitis, also other cells contribute to it. GCF-cathepsin K, perhaps together with intracellular, lysosomal collagenolytically active cathepsin K in fibroblasts, macrophages and gingival epithelial cells, can contribute to the loss of attachment and destruction of the periodontal ligament.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beklen et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: