Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduce a systematic nomenclature for mechanically linked molecules such as catenanes, rotaxanes, and assemblies derived from these structural elements which comes up to the increasing complexity of already synthesized interlocked molecules and the ones to be expected in future. Like in the naming of other substance classes (polycycles, phanes, crown compounds, podands, dendrimers) we attach importance to the fact, that certain units in the name, e.g. expressions in brackets, quickly convey an idea of the molecular architecture. Furthermore, this modular nomenclature reveals as many analogies to the IUPAC nomenclature as possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safarowsky et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: