Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A synthesis for the unsubstituted bicyclo[1.1.0]but-2-ylmethanols (endo- and exo-9) from 1,3-butadiene has been developed. Solvolyses of their sulfonates 10 and 11 took entirely different courses, as the endo compound 10 gave rise exclusively to rearranged products such as cyclopent-3-en-1-ol (14), while the exo compound 11 underwent only the substitution of the tosylate group with complete retention of the exo-bicyclo[1.1.0]but-2-ylmethyl skeleton. Under solvolytic conditions, 10 reacted at very similar rates to the corresponding monocyclic substrate, that is, cyclopropylcarbinyl mesylate (19); in contrast, 11 reacted only three times as fast as n-butyl tosylate and about 1000-fold slower than 10. The nature of the bicyclo[1.1.0]but-2-ylcarbinyl cations has been probed by quantum chemical calculations. Whereas, the exo isomer (exo-18) corresponds to a local energy minimum, the endo isomer is only a transition state [endo-18(TS)] for an automerization of the nonclassical cyclopent-3-en-1-yl cation (13) and converts into 13 by a Wagner-Meerwein rearrangement. The most favorable isomerization of exo-18 also leads to 13 but via a transition state resembling the 2-vinylcycloprop-1-yl cation [25(TS)]. On the introduction of methyl groups at positions 1 and 3 of exo-18, the cation is no longer an energy minimum and it becomes a transition state [27(TS)] for an automerization of the nonclassical 1,3-dimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl cation (28). The large effect of the methyl substitution rationalizes the puzzling results of the previous product and rate studies, which utilized various substituted derivatives of bicyclo[1.1.0]but-2-ylcarbinyl sulfonates as substrates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bentley et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: