Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the in situ distributions of contact angle and oil/brine interface curvature measured within millimeter‐sized rock samples from a producing hydrocarbon carbonate reservoir imaged after waterflooding using X‐ray microtomography. We analyze their spatial correlation combining automated methods for measuring contact angles and interfacial curvature (AlRatrout et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.07.018 ), with a recently developed method for pore‐network extraction (Raeini et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013312 ). The automated methods allow us to study image volumes of diameter approximately 1.9 mm and 1.2 mm long, obtaining hundreds of thousands of values from a data set with 435 million voxels. We calculate the capillary pressure based on the mode oil/brine interface curvature value and associate this value with a nearby throat in the pore space. We demonstrate the capability of our methods to distinguish different wettability states in the samples studied: water‐wet, weakly oil‐wet, and mixed‐wet. The contact angle and oil/brine interface curvature are spatially correlated over approximately the scale of an average pore. There is a wide distribution of contact angles within a single pore. A range of local oil/brine interface curvature is found with both positive and negative values. There is a correlation between interfacial curvature and contact angle in trapped ganglia, with ganglia in water‐wet patches tending to have a positive curvature and oil‐wet regions seeing negative curvature. We observed a weak correlation between average contact angle and pore size, with the larger pores tending to be more oil‐wet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlRatrout et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: