Key result
This review summarizes the accumulated knowledge over the past ten years regarding the use of methylene blue to treat vasoplegic syndrome after cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
To summarize the accumulated knowledge from the past ten years on employing methylene blue to treat vasoplegic syndrome after cardiac surgery.
This review summarizes 30 years of accumulated knowledge and experience regarding the use of methylene blue to treat vasoplegic syndrome following cardiac surgery.
Characterizes vasoplegic syndrome as nitric oxide-mediated endothelial dysfunction; leaves open targeted therapies pending prospective trials.
Vasoplegic syndrome (VS) comprises a constellation of concurrent signs and symptoms: hypotension, high cardiac index, low systemic vascular resistance, low filling pressures, the tendency to occur diffuse bleeding, and sustained hypotension. All of these parameters may persist even despite the use of high doses of vasoconstrictor amines. VS arises from vasoplegic endothelial dysfunction with excessive release of nitric oxide by polymorphonuclear leukocytes mediated by the nitric oxide synthase's inducible form and is associated with systemic inflammatory reaction and high morbimortality. The achievements regarding the treatment of VS with methylene blue (MB) are a valuable Brazilian contribution to cardiac surgery. The present text review was designed to deliver the accumulated knowledge in the past ten years of employing MB to treat VS after cardiac surgery. Considering that we have already published two papers describing acquired experiences and concepts after 15 and 20 years, now, as we achieve the 30-year mark, we compose a trilogy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Évora et al. (2021) conducted a review in Vasoplegic syndrome after cardiac surgery. Methylene blue was evaluated. This review summarizes the accumulated knowledge over the past ten years regarding the use of methylene blue to treat vasoplegic syndrome after cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: