Key result
Endothelial dysfunction classification lacks clinical adoption due to a paucity of practical applications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Developing clinical applications may increase interest in endothelial dysfunction classification; leaves open its utility and requires prospective validation.
Endothelium / dysfunction; Classification; Cardiovascular Diseases; Prevention; Risk Factors. Based on the assumption that a classification system is a very critical subject and may significantly improve the prediction of individual responses to treatment and related diseases, we proposed 16 years ago a classification for endothelial dysfunction including etiological, functional, and evolutionary aspects (Figure 1).1
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arcêncio et al. (2017) conducted an editorial in Endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction classification was evaluated. A classification system for endothelial dysfunction was proposed 16 years ago, but its low interest is attributed to a lack of clinical applications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: