Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alternative splicing is widely believed to have a major impact on almost all biological processes since it increases proteome complexity and thereby controls protein function. Recently, gene targeting in mice has been used to create in vivo models to study the regulation and consequences of alternative splicing. The evidence accumulated so far argues for a nonredundant, highly specific role of individual splicing factors in mammalian development, and furthermore, demonstrates the importance of distinct protein isoforms in vivo. In this review, we will compare phenotypes of mouse models for alternative splicing to crystallize common themes and to put them into perspective with the available in vitro data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Möröy et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: