Key result
Uric acid-lowering therapies did not improve left ventricular ejection fraction, walking distance test, BNP levels, or mortality compared to placebo in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Elevated serum uric acid is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in cardiovascular disease, but the causal relationship between uric acid-lowering therapies and heart failure remains controversial.
Do uric acid-lowering therapies improve clinical and surrogate outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=864)
Do uric acid-lowering therapies improve clinical and surrogate outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uric acid-lowering therapies do not improve cardiac function, exercise capacity, or mortality in patients with heart failure, suggesting uric acid may be a risk marker rather than a causal factor.
Background: Elevated serum uric acid (SUA) level is considered an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint of death or readmission in cardiovascular disease patients. However, the causal relationship between uric acid-lowering therapies (ULTs) and heart failure is still controversial. Design: Meta-analyses were performed to systematically compile available evidence to determine the overall effect of ULTs on heart failure patients. Method: We conducted this systematic review following the PRISMA statement guidelines. Databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials related to the influence of a ULT intervention in people with heart failure. Data extracted from the included studies were subjected to a meta-analysis to compare the effects of ULTs to a control. Results: Pooled analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LEVF) showed an insignificant result towards the ULT group (MD, 1.63%; 95%CI, −1.61 to 4.88; p = 0.32; three studies). Pooled analysis of the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) showed an insignificant result towards the ULT group (MD, 4.59; 95%CI, −12.683 to 22.00; p = 0.61; four studies). Pooled analysis of BNP/NT-pro-BNP led to a nearly statistically significant result towards the ULT group (SMD, −0.30; 95%CI, −0.64 to 0.04; p = 0.08; five studies). Pooled analysis of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death between ULTs (all XOIs) and placebo did not show a significant difference (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.15, p = 0.39). Conclusion: ULTs did not improve LVEF, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, 6MWT, all-cause mortality, and CV death in heart failure patients. UA may just be a risk marker of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=864). Uric acid-lowering therapies vs. Placebo was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 1.63%, 95% CI -1.61 to 4.88, p=0.32). Uric acid-lowering therapies did not improve left ventricular ejection fraction, walking distance test, BNP levels, or mortality compared to placebo in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: