Key result
The current density distribution non-uniformity of circular electrodes is about 30% less than that of square-shaped electrodes, and can be further improved by using an interface layer of intermediate resistivity and a high-resistivity perimeter ring.
Circular electrodes with an intermediate resistivity interface layer and a high-resistivity perimeter ring optimize current density distribution for external defibrillation, potentially reducing skin damage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce skin injury in defibrillation; hypothesis-generating from animal data, human trials needed before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Transthoracic defibrillation is the most common life-saving technique for the restoration of the heart rhythm of cardiac arrest victims. The procedure requires adequate application of large electrodes on the patient chest, to ensure low-resistance electrical contact. The current density distribution under the electrodes is non-uniform, leading to muscle contraction and pain, or risks of burning. The recent introduction of automatic external defibrillators and even wearable defibrillators, presents new demanding requirements for the structure of electrodes. METHOD AND RESULTS: Using the pseudo-elliptic differential equation of Laplace type with appropriate boundary conditions and applying finite element method modeling, electrodes of various shapes and structure were studied. The non-uniformity of the current density distribution was shown to be moderately improved by adding a low resistivity layer between the metal and tissue and by a ring around the electrode perimeter. The inclusion of openings in long-term wearable electrodes additionally disturbs the current density profile. However, a number of small-size perforations may result in acceptable current density distribution. CONCLUSION: The current density distribution non-uniformity of circular electrodes is about 30% less than that of square-shaped electrodes. The use of an interface layer of intermediate resistivity, comparable to that of the underlying tissues, and a high-resistivity perimeter ring, can further improve the distribution. The inclusion of skin aeration openings disturbs the current paths, but an appropriate selection of number and size provides a reasonable compromise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krasteva et al. (2002) studied Cardiac arrest / Defibrillation. Electrode shape and structure modifications (circular shape, interface layer, perimeter ring) vs. Standard square-shaped electrodes was evaluated on Current density distribution non-uniformity (ratio of maximum to minimum current density). The current density distribution non-uniformity of circular electrodes is about 30% less than that of square-shaped electrodes, and can be further improved by using an interface layer of intermediate resistivity and a high-resistivity perimeter ring.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: