Key result
Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium in patients with aortic valve diseases resulted in 92.1% freedom from major valve-related events at a mean follow-up of 24 months.
Why the study?
Bioprosthetic valve deterioration remains a major limitation following aortic valve replacement, though favorable results have been reported with autologous pericardium aortic valve neocuspidization.
What are the short-term outcomes of aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium in patients with various aortic valve diseases?
Observational (n=70)
What are the short-term outcomes of aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium in patients with various aortic valve diseases?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium demonstrates acceptable midterm survival and low rates of valve-related complications in patients with various aortic valve diseases.
Objectives Bioprosthetic valve deterioration remains a major limitation following aortic valve replacement. Favorable results have been reported with an autologous pericardium aortic valve neocuspidization. Methods Seventy patients (31 women and 39 men) (mean age, 62 ± 12 years) with aortic stenosis (n = 52 [74%]) or aortic regurgitation (n = 18 [26%]) underwent the aortic valve neocuspidization procedure. Thirty-four patients (49%) had a tricuspid valve, 35 (50%) had a bicuspid valve, and 1 (1%) had a monocuspid valve. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were, respectively, 2.2% ± 2% and 2.0% ± 1.8%. Four patients (6%) had active endocarditis and 2 (3%) had endocarditis sequelae. One patient (1%) had fibroelastoma. A combined procedure was performed in 33 patients (46%). Results The follow-up period was 24 ± 12 months. One patient (1%) died in hospital and 1 patient (1%) underwent conventional valve replacement for significant aortic regurgitation. Postoperative peak and mean pressure gradients were respectively 14 ± 5 and 8 ± 3 mm Hg. Aortic valve area was 2.5 ± 0.6 cm 2 . During follow-up, no patients died. Reintervention occurred in 2 patients (3%). At last follow-up, peak pressure gradient was 13 ± 7 mm Hg, mean pressure gradient was 7 ± 4 mm Hg, and aortic valve area was 2.3 ± 0.7 cm 2 . There was 1 recurrence of moderate aortic stenosis (1%). All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I (90%) or II (10%). Freedom from major valve-related events was 92.1%, (98.5% for death, 95.2% for reintervention, and 95.2% for endocarditis). Conclusions In our experience, the midterm outcomes of the aortic valve neocuspidization procedure with autologous glutaraldehyde fixed pericardium were acceptable for survival, operative risk and valve-related complications, for our all-comer patient population with various aortic valve diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khatchatourov et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Aortic valve diseases (aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation) (n=70). Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium was evaluated on Freedom from major valve-related events. Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium in patients with aortic valve diseases resulted in 92.1% freedom from major valve-related events at a mean follow-up of 24 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: